Genetic Programming: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Ideas) |
(→Ideas) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
How do I avoid infinite loops. |
How do I avoid infinite loops. |
||
Does uninitialised memory need to be avoided? |
|||
Random numbers. Share the same random number for all programs in the same run? |
|||
Revision as of 22:45, 1 November 2016
Possible targets
- LLVM - Can run as bytecode or compile to machine code.
- Web Assembly - New.
- JVM - I hate Java.
- MonoVM - Meh.
- SPIR-V - For the GPU. Can run naively (and fast), but would need to learn Vulkan/OpenCL at the same time. Problems with the GPU<->CPU differences.
- X86-64 - Native but CISC... Could use a subset...
- RISC-V - I love RISC-V (needs to be emulated).
- AVR - For a microcontroller (needs to be emulated).
- ARM - For a microcontroller (needs to be emulated).
- MIR - Rust intermediate level. Not sure if it would be any advantage over LLVM.
- BrainFuck - It's simplicity be good for genetic programming?
- GPTree - A Genetic Programming AST. Traditional.
- Maybe some made up IR that is then converted to X86-64, SPIPR-V or whatever (Isn't that LLVM bytecode?).
Ideas
- Make the genetic program evolve genetic algorithms.
- Evolve a selection function for example.
How do I avoid infinite loops. Does uninitialised memory need to be avoided? Random numbers. Share the same random number for all programs in the same run?